Correspondence
| Below is a copy of a letter we sent to the planing officer handling our application regarding the section 106 conditions that we proposed. We wrote seeking clarification on how and when the conditions would be negotiated. |
|
Development Control Dear James We are wondering what the position will be concerning our proposed s.106 agreement when the members will be making their decision on our planning application on 3rd November. More specifically, we would be grateful if you are able to let us know: (a) How will the terms of any s.106 agreement be negotiated? (b) Is it appropriate to discuss and set out those terms now? We have been discussing the matter with one of our immediate neighbours and both he and we are keen to ensure that the terms of the terms of the proposed s.106 agreement are in place before the November meeting so that the members can make a decision fully informed of those possible terms and incorporating those terms if appropriate. The terms would then be sufficiently clear and precise to ensure that the conditions set the desired parameters and provide guarantees for our neighbours, the local community generally and the Park of how the project will proceed. For example, our neighbour is particularly keen that the condition setting a limit to the number of permanent adult residents on the land is well-defined and clear as to its meaning and effect. For example, how will 'permanent' be defined? He would like to ensure that those considerations have taken place before the meeting. We believe that this would be helpful to the members in making their decision, as well as to ourselves, our neighbour and others. Please let us know what you think. |